we saw numerous negative reports about the performance, especially with the optional i9 CPU. We reviewed SKU and it took software updates and the i9 still disappoints. by Andreas Osthoff, 2019 01 22... We were interested in Vega GPU from AMD during our upcoming review update of Apple MacBook Pro 15, and our test model is also equipped with Core i9 processor we did not review before. By the performance of the After the mid 2018, about Apple users disappointed Core i9. We were eager to find out how Core i9 in MacBook Pro 15 performs, is worth paying. The answer is no, because Core i9 has in single-core scenarios thanks to its Turbo clock .. Once you start to stress more cores, however, Core i9-8950HK is slower than Core i7-8850H, even during Cinebench run. The consumption jumps up to Watts at the beginning, levels off at 47-52W. This is enough for clock of 6x 3.0-3.2 GHz pretty far away from the maximum 4.3 GHz. It's not surprising that mobile chips cannot sustain their Turbo clocks, except Core i9 in MacBook Pro 15 is operating just barely above its base frequency of 2.9 GHz... The solution of MacBook Pro was designed for 45W quad-cores and which cannot be dissipated by the cooling..
Read more